| 
Railhub Archive 1995-03-30 DoT-003 Department of Transport0
Mawhinney endorses HSC view on future of Automatic Train Protection
keywords: click to search
 ATP
 Department of Transport
 signalling
 
Phrases in [single square brackets] are hyperlinks in the original document
Phrases in [[double square brackets]] are editorial additions or corrections
Phrases in [[[triple square brackets]]] indicate embedded images or graphics in the original document. (These are not usually archived unless they contain significant additional information.) | | 
         Mawhinney endorses HSC view on future of Automatic Train Protection _______________________________________________________________

 related documents
type Press release note 98
Dr Brian Mawhinney, the Secretary of State for Transport, today endorsed the view of the Health and Safety Commission (HSC) that automatic train protection (ATP) measures may be justified on parts of the rail network. However, he said that he also agreed with the advice of British Rail and Railtrack, endorsed by the HSC, that the fitment of ATP throughout the network could not be justified because the costs far outweigh the benefits. Replying to a Parliamentary Question from Bob Dunn MP (Dartford), Dr Mawhinney said: "Serious railway accidents are relatively rare and there has been a significant improvement in railway safety in recent years. Accidents involving signals passed at danger (SPADs), overspeeding and buffer stop collisions, which ATP would prevent, are infrequent and account for about 3% of fatalities and injuries (excluding trespassers and suicides). But there is no room for complacency about the need to pursue cost effective measures to reduce the risk of accidents to the lowest reasonably practicable level. "On the basis of advice I have received from the HSC, I have concluded that applications of ATP, other automatic devices or measures giving protection against ATP-preventable accidents may be justified on parts of the network. "British Rail and Railtrack have advised me that network-wide fitment of ATP as piloted is not justifiable because the costs far outweigh the benefits. The HSC has endorsed this view and, furthermore, considers that there are alternative safety investments which would be likely to yield greater effectiveness in terms of lives saved, and better value for money." Dr Mawhinney stressed that British Rail and Railtrack remain committed to a co-ordinated programme to reduce the risks associated with signals passed at danger, overspeeding and buffer stop collisions. He explained that Railtrack is giving high priority to the development of appropriate techniques for analysing the costs and benefits of all safety projects addressing these risks and their application at individual locations and confirmed that he has asked the HSC for an overall progress report in July. In addition he said that the HSC has advised that ATP or Automatic Train Control (ATC) should be adopted as standard on new high speed lines including the Channel Tunnel Rail Link and that full consideration should be given to installing ATP within future major resignalling works, such as modernisation of the West Coast Main Line. NOTES TO EDITORS 1. ATP is a safety system that ensures that trains cannot pass a signal at red and keeps a train's speed within the permitted limit. 2. Railtrack announced on 22 March 1995 its intention to develop a new train control system which uses transmission based in-cab signalling as part of the modernisation of the West Coast Main Line. The system will incorporate ATP functions. An automatic train protection system will be a requirement of the new high speed Channel Tunnel Rail Link. 3. A copy of the full Parliamentary Question and Answer is attached. HOUSE OF COMMONS Mr Bob Dunn (Con - Dartford): To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what advice he has received from the Health and Safety Commission (HSC) and Railtrack on British Rail's report on Automatic Train Protection (ATP), and if he will make a statement. DR BRIAN MAWHINNEY Serious railway accidents are relatively rare and there has been a significant improvement in railway safety in recent years. Accidents involving signals passed at danger, overspeeding and buffer stop collisions, which ATP would prevent, are infrequent and account for about 3% of fatalities and injuries (excluding trespassers and suicides). The trend in the number of serious incidents where signals have been passed at danger (SPAD) has been downward in the last five years. But there is no room for complacency about the need to pursue cost effective measures to reduce the risk of accidents to the lowest reasonably practicable level. The British Rail (BR) report on ATP examined the technical feasibility, costs and benefits of two pilot ATP systems. Copies of the report were placed in the Library of the House last July. The HSC and Railtrack have concluded that the report was thorough and sound. I welcome that conclusion. On the basis of advice I have received from the HSC, I have concluded that applications of ATP, other automatic devices or measures giving protection against ATP-preventable accidents may be justified on parts of the network. In particular, the HSC has asked the Health and Safety Executive to explore with Railtrack the options for tackling ATP- preventable accidents, and the criteria that might be used for identifying parts of the network where such measures could yield value for money, with a view to receiving a proposed strategy from Railtrack by June 1995. In addition and in the longer term, the HSC has advised me that ATP or Automatic Train Control (ATC) should be adopted as standard on new high speed lines including the Channel Tunnel Rail Link, and that full consideration should be given to installing ATP functions within future major resignalling works, such as modernisation of the West Coast Main Line. BR and Railtrack have advised me that network-wide fitment of ATP as piloted is not justifiable because the costs far outweigh the benefits. The HSC has endorsed this view and, furthermore, considers that there are alternative safety investments which would be likely to yield greater effectiveness in terms of lives saved, and better value for money. The BR report on ATP has demonstrated the importance of assessing the costs and benefits of all investment aimed at improving safety to ensure that funding goes to schemes which maximise the benefits for rail users. Copies of the HSC's full advice, which I accept in full, have been placed in the Library of the House. British Rail and Railtrack remain committed to a co-ordinated programme to reduce the risks associated with signals passed at danger, overspeeding and buffer stop collisions. As part of this programme, the feasibility of a drivers' reminder device is being researched which will help prevent drivers stopped at danger signals from inadvertently starting against these signals when the train is ready to move, for example at a station. This is one of the more common type of SPAD leading to serious consequences and such a device could potentially deliver up to 25% of the benefits of network-wide ATP. An early trial of this device is proposed. A further project is examining enhancement of the present Automatic Warning System (AWS) so that the brakes are applied automatically if a train approaches a red signal at excessive speed indicating an impending signal passed at danger or over-speeding incident. A detailed specification is being drawn up. Risk analysis is also being applied to track layout and signalling design, to ensure that safety factors are taken into account quantitatively in the design of the network. Protective signalling measures have already been introduced at a number of vulnerable locations and examination of other vulnerable locations is ongoing. Railtrack is giving high priority to the development of appropriate techniques for quantifying the costs and benefits of all these projects and considering their application at individual locations. ATP and other devices are not the only way of preventing or mitigating certain risks. The human factors involved will continue to be addressed through driver selection, training, motivation and supervision programmes. This includes close attention to driver familiarisation when new rolling stock and signalling is introduced, and a rigorous alcohol and drugs policy. The Chiltern Line and Great Western pilot ATP installations will continue in service, and ATP will be extended to the new Heathrow Express Link in due course. The scope for improvement in the cost/benefit ratio of ATP will continue to be examined through these schemes. I have asked the HSC for an overall progress report in July.
Railhub Archive ::: 1995-03-30 DoT-003
 | | 

Thursday 18



Not logged on Visitor









  2 stories

| |