Monday 16 June 2025 | | home |
![]() | archive |
 |  |
![]() ::: RMT ScotRail staff walk out |
![]() Railhub Archive | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Department of TransportLocal authorities must play leading part in developing transport solutions says Mawhinney
Brian Mawhinney, Secretary of State for Transport said today. Speaking to the Leeds and Bradford Chamber of Commerce, Dr Mawhinney was making the last of six speeches which have encouraged a wide debate about the future direction of transport policy. He said there was clear evidence that simply providing alternatives to the car by making improvements to public transport or making it easier to make journeys on foot or by bicycle was not enough. "That is why I have asked my Department to do some serious work on how we can make it easier for people to switch from one form of transport to another." Dr Mawhinney emphasised the role of local authorities in tackling local transport problems: "Central government cannot impose a single blueprint which will be effective everywhere. People need to make their own choices and so do local communities. Local authorities must contribute to developing transport solutions for their urban areas. "I stress the importance of local decision making. One of the more frustrating aspects of my job as Secretary of State for Transport is that too often local authorities seem to look to me to act as judge and jury over transport problems in their areas. Perhaps, when considering local road schemes, local authorities should place more emphasis on reaching a consensus locally - between residents and business and between neighbouring authorities. Dr Mawhinney went on to pose a series of questions about the respective roles of central and local government in transport matters: "This raises interesting questions about the roles of central and local government and about the mix of national and local responsibilities. At present there seems to be little logic - and certainly little public understanding - of who owns which parts of the road network. Perhaps local authorities should have more influence over the roads which genuinely impinge on their communities? "I am aware that there is a view that the management of roads warrants a closer look. How do we strike a balance between national and local priorities? Is it a question of "ownership" of the roads or is it a question of getting the various highways authorities to work better together?" Dr Mawhinney emphasised the private sector's role in partnership with local and central government, in tackling transport problems and posed a number of questions: "Business can become involved in funding specific transport projects - such contributions may relate to large schemes where a particular business benefits, or to offering bus services to local facilities, as some supermarkets do. They can enter into partnerships with other businesses and local government to work out transport strategies. The sorts of issues they might address are: - Could a park and ride scheme be made more effective if a private developer ran it and made it part of a wider commercial development? - Could employers do more to encourage car sharing by their employees, or encourage them to use some other form of transport, say by providing improved facilities for cyclists, as part of an agreement with the local authority to provide more dedicated cycle routes? - Could businesses adjust their working patterns, for example, by staggering working hours, by allowing more employees to work at home or making more use of the information super-highway and rather less of other sorts of highway? Dr Mawhinney called on organisations and individuals to look at the series of speeches: "I hope people will look at the speeches together, and then get together to suggest some answers to the questions I have raised; not in comfortable, like-minded groups but in difficult and challenging forums. Only by taking such risks and accepting such challenges can we move forward to the next stage of the debate." SECRETARY OF STATE FOR TRANSPORT SPEECH ON URBAN TRANSPORT 10 April 1995 Introduction 1. In this series of speeches about transport policy, I have looked in turn at the economic importance of transport, at environmental considerations, at freight movements and the international dimension. Two weeks ago I spoke about the importance of choice and the effect this can have on travel patterns. Today I want to draw these various strands together to see how they interact at a local level. 2. Local economies depend on good transport. And the way transport decisions affect local environments is among the most hotly debated of local issues. There is a range of fresh ideas -big and small - being generated at local level and which are coming together to help sustain thriving communities in ways that are sensitive to local needs. There may be pointers here to some practical solutions which could be available to us nationally. What is urban transport for? 3. Competitive, thriving cities depend on moving goods and people efficiently and in comfort within their boundaries. Although we tend to think of people commuting to city centres to work, over 60% of workers in cities of over 250,000 people work outside the centre, often travelling between suburbs. 4. Journeys to work represent 20% of all journeys of 1 mile or more. People also travel in order to go shopping and to acquire all the goods and services they want for their daily lives. They make the multitude of choices to which I referred in my last speech. The growth of car ownership has given people much greater flexibility - indeed liberty - in how they make these different journeys within and around towns. 5. Changes in the way our businesses have organised themselves have also affected urban transport patterns. National and international distribution tends to be from fewer and fewer centres. Manufacturing has become more concentrated in specialised suppliers with components delivered "just in time". The result is an extraordinary diversity of urban trip patterns which it is very difficult to reduce to a simple pattern of flows between fixed points. Is there a problem? 6. The way urban economies are organised reflects this diversity. Towns and their people adapt to change. They seek new opportunities for business and new ways of providing the necessary transport infrastructure. Ways have to be found to keep people and goods moving around our cities and to keep their economies vibrant. In doing so local communities are well aware of the importance of tackling the potential problems of congestion and environmental damage. Unhealthy cities, where people and goods cannot move freely, will not work. 7. As more people use their cars traffic increases, congestion worsens, journey conditions become less pleasant for everyone and air quality deteriorates. As a result, commerce and industry may be required to meet extra transport costs. Buses may not be used fully despite - perhaps because of - the heavy congestion through which sometimes they have to struggle. Consequently, in some places, people have started to move out and look for places to live which are more agreeable and less affected by traffic noise and pollution. 8. This presents a challenge to our towns and cities. Each community - those who live and work together - will not be keen to see their town decline. Many others do not want to see urban development eating up more and more of the surrounding countryside. They would probably also say that they value the traditional urban town centre and that they do not want to see it die - quite the contrary. Transport and land use planning 9. All these factors point to the desirability of supporting traditional town centres in ways which will ensure sustained prosperity and provide people with real choices. This is the thrust behind the revised Planning Policy Guidance 13 (PPG13) on transport, which my Department and the Department of the Environment published jointly just over a year ago. 10. The Guidance encourages local authorities to promote developments which are accessible through a variety of travel modes. I want to help create the circumstances where people can make intelligent, informed choices between a range of increasingly attractive options. I am not in the business of telling people to stay at home. The concepts behind the planning guidance are not revolutionary. To a large extent they are about reinforcing those patterns of development which we value most: the high street, the neighbourhood, and the community which mixes rather than segregates activities. But land use planning is incremental and its effects are long term. So we need to draw on other measures too. Private transport and road use 11. The private car will continue to play a vital role in the urban context. The question is, will it be used primarily for those journeys for which there is no real alternative? If not, can we persuade people to change their behaviour and encourage them to use alternatives where they exist? And we ought to ask, if there should be persuaders? If so, who should assume that role? Public transport 12. When we look at other forms of transport, we see that public transport is not the forgotten Cinderella of transport as some in the media would have us believe. Public transport long since came to the ball and is having a lively time! -buses 13. As one who recognises the great potential of the bus, I am proud of the initiatives we have already taken to breathe new life into this form of travel. The bus is flexible, relatively cheap and is likely to remain the predominant way of travel in urban areas. Since we deregulated the bus market and put the industry back into the private sector, where it properly belongs, bus mileage outside London has risen by 24% and operator costs per vehicle mile have fallen by about 41% in real terms. 14. Passenger interests have been brought to the fore. Private operators have introduced greater choice of services and more flexible ones. In many cases this has meant newer, smaller vehicles providing services to places not previously served. Recently there has been an upturn in the purchase of new vehicles with modern specifications that are aimed at meeting the needs of all passengers. And, very importantly, some 90% of new buses now have some features designed to make bus use easier for elderly and many disabled passengers. 15. Equally, the Government has shown itself willing to innovate. In London, for example, we have experimented successfully with Red Routes. On the pilot route, bus users now enjoy faster journeys while road casualty rates have fallen. Red Route plans include pedestrian crossings, bus lanes, new parking spaces and even tree planting. They are designed to balance the needs of everyone living and working along the routes with those who drive along them. 16. Urban local authorities throughout the country take a similar view of the role buses can play in sustaining a healthy economy and environment. Authorities have powers to support services which cannot be provided commercially. They also have the power to look at priority measures to ease traffic flow on bus routes. 17. Local authorities and private operators can -and do - work together. Here in Leeds for example the City council and an operator - Yorkshire Rider - have got together to plan a "guided bus" scheme. New "Superbuses" are already running on the streets of Leeds, with provision for guide-wheels to be added later, when the guideways are completed. Construction of these by the City council is about to begin. There are plans for guided bus schemes in other cities, such as Hull. Such schemes are less expensive than putting in place light rail schemes. -railways 18. Most of the largest urban areas have well developed conventional rail networks. These need to be used better so that they can make their full contribution to serving local transport needs. Privatisation will increase the scope for the development of new services - those which are geared to what the passenger wants. They are likely to make the most contribution where there are large, heavily concentrated flows of passengers. In some areas, light rail will also have an important role to play. -modal interchanges and better information 19. But providing alternatives to the car is not enough. That is why I have asked my Department to do some serious work on how we can make it easier for people to switch from one form of transport to another - in the jargon `modal shift'. I am particularly keen to see different operators getting together with each other as well as with local authorities to make it easier for people to move from one transport mode to another. A seamless journey would be welcomed by all travellers - it is at the seams where journeys tend to come apart. This will happen only if travel operators consider the services which they provide from the passenger's point of view. 20. There are large scale interchanges where we see this working in practice. Gatwick and Heathrow Airports, for example, are served by a range of transport modes and are actively seeking to improve them. Gatwick links to Victoria Station in London and onto the M23. Heathrow links to the M25 and M4, by tube line to Central London and, soon by express rail service to Paddington. Both are served by coaches. And you will not have missed my announcement last week about how we intend to ensure that better use is made of road, rail, coach and airport services in the South-East to increase choice for both private and business travellers. 21. But not all improvements need be on this scale. Reliable up-to-date information can make all the difference to the choices people make about how they travel - and to getting our cities to work more smoothly. A lot of time is wasted sitting in traffic jams or cruising around looking for car parking spaces - and a lot of road space is taken up as a result. People might avoid this and travel by other means if they have the right information at the right place and the right time. 22. This might mean something as simple as better or more comprehensive timetables - perhaps combined to cover both bus and rail services. It might involve harnessing the potential of new technology, such as the "Countdown" trial which is delivering up-to-date information at bus-stops in parts of London, or even more sophisticated schemes such as the integrated ROMANSE system under trial in Southampton. The effects of better information on moving from one transport mode to another was one of the key issues considered by the Transport Panel of the Government's Technology Foresight Programme in their recently published report. Cycling and walking 23. Towns and cities see concentrations of people making many short journeys. This means lots of pedestrians and the potential for lots of cyclists. Cycling and walking are the most environmentally friendly of all forms of transport - but sometimes towns and cities seem to be the least friendly environments in which to practice such healthy pursuits. 24. Just before I came to the Department of Transport last summer, the Government set out its policy for the future of cycling. I was Health Minister at the time and the Department of Health was one of a number of Departments that was actively involved in developing that statement. I have ensured that cycling - and walking - remain on the agenda. Indeed, earlier this year, I am told that I became the first Secretary of State for Transport to make an oversees trip specifically to look at ways to encourage cycling. 25. Changing attitudes to cycling and walking will not be easy. What local authorities can achieve is the demonstration of best practice and encouragement to others. This might mean local authorities setting up safe pedestrian and cycle routes and introducing new traffic calming measures. It can mean employers showing the way with, for example, loans to help buy bicycles - as offered in my Department - or more facilities for safe parking for bicycles and showers for employees. What lessons, can be learnt from York and Hull, for example, where cycling represents 20% and 14% respectively of all journeys to work? Traffic restraint 26. To be effective, any strategy to tackle transport problems in urban areas will almost certainly need to combine measures which manage car use with measures to improve other forms of transport. There is clear evidence that improvements to public transport or pedestrian and cycle measures alone are not a sufficient answer. That was one of the findings of research, sponsored by my Department, which examined the impact of a range of transport policies on traffic and vehicle emissions in five cities, including Leeds. Similar messages emerge from studies of how certain European cities have dealt with congestion. 27. Managing car use may mean some restriction of car use. Examples of restraint already abound, in a variety of forms, such as: - pedestrianisation of city centres; - Leeds' proposed public transport box; - parking restrictions, including clamping, aimed particularly at commuter traffic. These can be tightened progressively as in Ipswich or Exeter; - capacity reductions along routes into town as bus priority is established and so- called "rat-runs" are closed. 28. And we should look carefully at the role parking can play in managing car use in urban centres. Local authorities need to think about whether to encourage the provision of more parking -and if so should this be for shoppers or for those who want to drive to work? Or should they seek to discourage the provision of parking - perhaps by restricting the number of car parking spaces allowed at new developments? And are local authorities talking to each other enough to ensure that we do not face a situation where one council discourages parking but a neighbouring council encourages it? 29. There is concern that restrictions on car use may spell commercial death for traditional urban centres. This is particularly worrying for heavily urbanised areas where a number of different commercial centres are seen to be in competition with one another. 30. I recognise this concern but I do not accept that decline is inevitable. Towns and cities that have successfully put such schemes in place have done so as part of their attempt to maintain thriving city centre economies. It is a question of getting the balance right. So ultimately it may be in the commercial interests of the whole city to restrain car use, preserve the quality of life and ensure that the city remains one to which people want to come and in which they want to do business. City congestion charging 31. Economists tell me that the most efficient way of allocating scarce road space would be to charge for it. They may be right; using the price mechanism is an economically efficient way of allocating resources and ensuring that the benefits to society from those resources are maximised. However, introducing city congestion charging would be a major - and controversial - undertaking. And at the moment it unrealistic for we do not have necessary information about its potential consequences - good or bad. Indeed, we do not have sufficient facts on which to make a policy determination. 32. That is why we embarked on a major three-year research programme to look at what might be the impact of introducing congestion charging in London. I expect the results of this research to be available this summer. 33. While I will not prejudge the results, I believe further work will be necessary before we will be able to formulate a policy. Large issues will need further examination, such as: - When will the technology be available to deliver a feasible, viable system which can be implemented, administered and enforced over a wide urban area? - How would people react to being asked to pay for something which plays a central part in their lives, and which they have been used to getting for nothing? - Could they be persuaded that the wider economic benefits of charging outweigh the costs to them personally? And would that be true? - What kind of price would need to be charged to bring reductions in car use in urban areas? - What would be the effect of charging on local businesses and property values? - How would the necessary charging legislation deal with privacy concerns? - Who would pay to install the vehicle systems and how would towns cope with occasional visitors? The role of local authorities 34. Whatever the future of congestion charging, central government cannot impose a single blueprint which will be effective everywhere. People need to make their own choices and so do local communities. Local authorities must contribute to developing transport solutions for their urban areas. 35. I stress the importance of local decision making. One of the more frustrating aspects of my job as Secretary of State for Transport is that too often local authorities seem to look to me to act as judge and jury over transport problems in their areas. Perhaps, when considering local road schemes, local authorities should place more emphasis on reaching a consensus locally - between residents and business and between neighbouring authorities. 36. This raises interesting questions about the roles of central and local government and about the mix of national and local responsibilities. At present there seems to be little logic - and certainly little public understanding - of who owns which parts of the road network. Perhaps local authorities should have more influence over the roads which genuinely impinge on their communities? 37. I am aware that there is a view that the management of roads warrants a closer look. How do we strike a balance between national and local priorities? Is it a question of "ownership" of the roads or is it a question of the various highways authorities working better together. 38. I want to support local strategies which provide genuine choices. I am keen that local authorities develop programmes with a variety of complementary measures which seek to address their local transport needs, rather than concentrating on individual transport schemes in isolation. That is what is behind, for example, my Department's approach to local transport funding - the so called "package approach". -local targets 39. In deciding which mix of measures will be most effective for any area, the relative costs of the measures will be important. Some schemes, such as new large-scale public transport infrastructure, are very expensive; others, perhaps to encourage cycling, may not be so expensive. But the cost-effectiveness of all schemes will be enhanced by the implementation of a strategy to manage demand. 40. One way of achieving this balance, of assessing cost-effectiveness against a common standard, may be through the use of local operational targets. As I have argued before, the important thing is that any such targets should be realistic, cost-effective and focus on the right measures. They must also meet with widespread public acceptance. Focusing on a set of clearly defined objectives in this way could be a way forward and I would welcome views on this. The role of the private sector 41. Local authorities can develop local strategies only with effective input from others in the community. And they do not have to be the ones to take the lead in initiating change. Transport operators themselves could do this. They are the ones with practical experience of the journeys people actually want to make. This experience must be captured in the planning process. 42. Then there is the business community as a whole. Business can become involved in funding specific transport projects - such contributions may relate to large schemes where a particular business benefits, or to offering bus services to local facilities, as some supermarkets do. They can enter into partnerships with other businesses and local government to work out transport strategies. The sorts of issues they might address are: - Could a park and ride scheme be made more effective if a private developer ran it and made it part of a wider commercial development? - Could employers do more to encourage car sharing by their employees, or encourage them to use some other form of transport, say by providing improved facilities for cyclists, as part of an agreement with the local authority to provide more dedicated cycle routes? - Could businesses adjust their working patterns, for example, by staggering working hours, by allowing more employees to work at home or making more use of the information super-highway and rather less of other sorts of highway? The role of individuals 43. Finally, we need to remember that while central and local government can introduce measures which will influence people's travel behaviour, only the people themselves can take the day to day decisions which will determine future travel patterns and so help to determine the quality of urban life. Conclusion 44. The challenges for local transport raise many of the questions which are fundamental to the national transport debate. - Is there sufficient consensus that the vitality and prosperity of traditional urban centres are seriously threatened unless active steps are taken to manage traffic flows? - Is it accepted that any policy may need to employ both the sticks and carrots approach and if so, which sticks and which carrots? Could the adoption of local targets help in striking the right balance? - What part can land use planning realistically be expected to play? What restrictions are people prepared to accept on the places they can live, work and shop? - What role does parking policy have to play in encouraging more use of public transport? - How can we make public transport more attractive? And how can we encourage better quality vehicles, better interchange facilities and better information for passengers? - What restrictions on car use in urban areas might people think justified to help solve the problems of congestion and pollution from traffic? - Do local authorities have the tools they need to tackle their job? If not, what more could we do to help? - How can the local business community be more closely involved in the process, whether as developers, as employers or as transport users? 45. If there were simple answers to all these questions, there would be a simple solution to the problems of urban transport. I have encouraged this national debate and made my six speeches because I recognise that there are no simple answers. 46. I hope you and others will look at the speeches together, and then get together to suggest some answers to the questions I have raised. Not in comfortable, like-minded groups but in difficult and challenging forums. Only by taking such risks and accepting such challenges can we move forward to the next stage of the debate.
Railhub Archive ::: 1995-04-10 DoT-001 | ![]() ![]() Monday![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 2 stories ![]() ![]() |