Wednesday 27 October 2021

 

< back | business | images | knowledge | library | rail unveiled | home

archive

::: RMT threatens national industrial action over service cuts



Railhub Archive
2012-05-29 ORR-001
Office of Rail Regulation

0

ORR demands better performance for long distance rail passengers


keywords: click to search


performance
PPM



Phrases in [single square brackets] are hyperlinks in the original document

Phrases in [[double square brackets]] are editorial additions or corrections

Phrases in [[[triple square brackets]]] indicate embedded images or graphics in the original document. (These are not usually archived unless they contain significant additional information.)


Office of Rail Regulation

ORR demands better performance for long distance rail passengers
_______________________________________________________________


date
29 May 2012
source Office of Rail Regulation
type Press release

note ORR/09/12


The Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) has today told Network Rail to deliver better levels of punctuality for passengers on long distance train services, or face a substantial penalty.

Following an extensive investigation, the rail regulator has instructed Network Rail to deliver plans agreed with train operators for better levels of punctuality on long distance services in 2012-13, and speed-up further improvements towards meeting its committed punctuality target of 92% in 2013-14. If the company fails to deliver the 2013-14 target it will face a substantial financial penalty. The size of any financial penalty will reflect the extent of Network Rail’s failure to meet the commitment, increasing by £1.5 million per 0.1 percentage point it drops below the 92% punctuality target.

While passengers are experiencing good levels of punctuality by historical standards – currently 89.2% for long distance services - Network Rail committed to achieving more, and taxpayers and customers have paid the company to deliver. ORR’s investigation showed that the company struggled to cope with the challenges of reaching its long distance punctuality target. The rail regulator, while recognising the impact of issues such as cable theft, concluded that many of the difficulties Network Rail has encountered, including problems with timetable planning and predicting and spotting equipment failures, are of the company’s own making. More trains are running on the network but the company could have done more to deal with the risks to performance.

ORR Chief Executive, Richard Price, said:

“Levels of punctuality on long distance rail services across Britain are good by historical standards but passengers should be experiencing even better levels of train performance, benefitting from the punctuality commitments which they and taxpayers have funded Network Rail to deliver.

“Let me be clear, we expect Network Rail to hit their targets, and to achieve this by implementing sustainable improvements that really benefit passengers. In the last year, approximately 13.7 million passengers’ journeys on long distance trains were affected by late or cancelled trains – and this is unacceptable. That is why we are proposing a penalty which puts pressure on Network Rail to achieve its funded target – an incentive for the company to do everything it can to deliver improvements for passengers including reducing the number of long delays that impact so badly on rail users.

“We will not allow Network Rail to rest at ‘good’ performance when the public have paid the company to achieve excellence. It is our duty as the regulator to push for improvements for passengers - and that is what we will do.”

When ORR sets Network Rail’s funding for the next five year period (2014-2019), it will take into account failure to deliver the outputs for which the company was paid in the current period. Additionally, ORR will consider, in its annual assessment of Network Rail’s financial performance, whether it should adjust its assessment of efficiency for a failure to deliver the commitments.

Notes to editors
ORR concluded that Network Rail is likely to be in breach of its licence with regards to performance in the long distance sector in 2013-14 and proposes (subject to statutory consultation) to make an enforcement order requiring Network Rail to further review and develop plans to meet, as far as reasonably practicable, its committed performance target of 92%. Furthermore, ORR will be carefully monitoring progress of the agreed plans for 2012-13 and will take further action if they are not being delivered. To read ORR’s letter to Network Rail see: www.rail-reg.gov.uk/upload/pdf/290512-performance-breach-letter.pdf

In January 2012, the regulator issued an enforcement order requiring Network Rail to develop new, robust plans to help recover long distance performance, showing that it is doing everything reasonably practicable to deliver the performance commitments it has made for long distance services in 2012-2013. For more information, see: www.rail-reg.gov.uk/server/show/ConWebDoc.10801
PPM (public performance measure) for long distance trains is a measure of the number of trains arriving at their final destination within ten minutes of the advertised time. Network Rail committed to, and was funded to achieve 92% PPM for the long distance sector in 2013-14 as part of ORR’s last periodic review.

92% punctuality equates to 43,661 long distance trains running ten or more minutes late, or being cancelled, per year (approximately 840 trains per week /120 trains per day). ORR will fine Network Rail £1.5 million for each 0.1 percentage point (546 trains) below the 92% target. Network Rail’s current long distance punctuality is 89.2% and its firmly committed plans would take it to 90.4%.
Provision is made for the penalty to be reduced if Network Rail can demonstrate it has done everything reasonably practicable to meet its target. Any financial penalty, dictated by the extent of Network Rail’s failure to meet its long distance commitment, will be payable in or after April 2014.

There were 13.7 million journeys on long distance services that were either late or cancelled in the last year. This figure has been calculated from provisional 2011-12 passenger journeys data and based on the number of tickets bought.


Railhub Archive ::: 2012-05-29 ORR-001





Wednesday
27




Not logged on
Visitor










11 stories





2 documents



6 documents